But people that "know", know to be ignorant... usually the real ignorant believe to not to be. So we are in a difficult dilemma with a potential incorrect solution... who really knows?
For this reason the idiots in real world sometimes (you can change the word related to your nature…) prevail
At the same time the human knowledge in the Time is always based on the “illusion to know”…till the latest “discovery”
then what would be the difference?
Maybe to maintain the Doubt…
But, however, the Doubt normally acts on people “that know to be ignorant”, not in the real ignorant : )
For this reason the idiots in real world sometimes (you can change the word related to your nature…) prevail
At the same time the human knowledge in the Time is always based on the “illusion to know”…till the latest “discovery”
then what would be the difference?
Maybe to maintain the Doubt…
But, however, the Doubt normally acts on people “that know to be ignorant”, not in the real ignorant : )
So in people that “know to be ignorant”, so they “know”, the illusion of knowledge could act as “short term paradigm”.
Instead in real ignorant the illusion of knowledge always acts or better they do not care about the knowledge… ah ah ah… it is simpler.
Instead in real ignorant the illusion of knowledge always acts or better they do not care about the knowledge… ah ah ah… it is simpler.
The Arlecchino’s reflections
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlequin
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlecchino
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqCeAPK5pC8
: )
無味的
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento